Home Featured Gold And Presidential Politics: Why Your Vote May Not Count

Gold And Presidential Politics: Why Your Vote May Not Count

Gold And Presidential Politics: Why Your Vote May Not Count

Full Article: Gold And Presidential Politics: Why Your Vote May Not Count

By Kira Brecht, Kitco.com

(Kitco News) – Sept 9 –Brace yourself. The winds are changing. Come 2017, there will be a new occupant in the Oval Office in Washington, D.C.  However, it may be disturbing to know that your vote may not really matter, depending on what state you live in.

It’s not the popular vote in the United States that
determines who wins the election, it’s the Electoral College.

When Americans go to the polls and vote for President and Vice President, they are actually voting for the Electoral College. It is these electors –who actually choose the nation’s president.

This is an elaborate system created by the Founding Fathers in which the Constitution delegates each state a number of electoral votes equal to the combined total of the state’s Senate and House of Representatives delegations. There is a group of electors voted in for each political party in every state. In the winner-take-all system, whoever wins the popular vote of that state will win all the Electoral Votes from that state.

Example: if you live in California, no matter who you vote for, Clinton is expected to take all the Electoral votes (55) of that state.
Or, if you live in Idaho (4) Wyoming (3), or Tennessee (11), Trump is seen as solid in those states, so no matter who you vote for the Electors will vote for Trump.

The current count: RealClearPolitics.com has a running total in real time and is a good source for this information.

  • The current read is: Clinton 229, Trump 154

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/

Why was this system developed: Some say, this system was designed because the founding fathers, who were an educated bunch, didn’t trust the rank and file and perhaps less educated citizenship to actually choose the leaders of the country.

Question: How many times was a US president elected to the White House who did not win the popular vote? Yes, it’s happened.

Answer: Four

  1. 1824: John Quincy Adams took the White House without winning the popular vote
  2. 1876: Rutherford Hayes won the Electoral College, but lost the popular vote
  3. 1888: Benjamin Harrison won the election, but lost the popular vote
  4. 2000: George W. Bush lost the popular vote to Al Gore, but Bush still took the Electoral College and the White House.

Source: factcheck.org

Swing States Hold the Key

Hint: To track pre-election trends, follow polls in the key battleground swing states. These include:

  • Florida
  • Ohio
  • Pennsylvania
  • North Carolina
  • Colorado

Clinton versus Trump: Economic Implications For Gold

“Clinton  represents  the  status  quo  and  Trump  represents  serious  change  amid  increased
uncertainty. Trump’s easier fiscal policy and decreased regulation could drive growth and
inflation  higher  in  the near  term,  perhaps  requiring  tighter  monetary  policy. However, increased uncertainty under Trump could weigh on growth,” according to a research report from Credit Suisse.

Trump: has potential to get his proposals passed in a likely Republican controlled Congress.
Key points:

    • Major tax legislation could get passed quickly.

Economic result: “Projections of the future debt will balloon as a result of the tax changes, but lower taxes would likely boost growth forecasts in the short term,” Credit Suisse says.

  • New Fed chief: Trump has already said in an interview with CNBC that he would replace Janet Yellen when her term is up. Her term leading the Fed ends in February 2018.
  • Potential to ease regulations in some industries.
  • Opposition to trade deals.

Clinton: is expected to be largely status quo, as her policies are similar to President Obamas. Growth, policy and earnings expectations are unliklely to change significantly, Credit Suisse says.
Key points:

  • She could face difficulties passing bills through a Republican House.
  • Support for trade deals.

Bottom Line For Gold

  • With a Clinton win there is potential for “more of the same.” The current environment has been supportive to gold.
  • With A Trump win there is potential for inflation, and potential for policy uncertainty which is bullish for gold.

No matter who wins the White House in November, gold could come out a winner.

Your popular vote still may not matter. There has been some rumblings for a National Popular Vote bill, but it hasn’t gained a lot of steam. Maybe it is time for this proposal to gain some attention. It would equalize political clout among all states, and all Americans.

By Kira Brecht, Kitco.com



Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Kitco Metals Inc. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Kitco Metals Inc. nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Kitco Metals Inc. and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Disclaimer© 2010 Junior Gold ReportJunior Gold Report’ Newsletter: Junior Gold Report’s Newsletter is published as a copyright publication of Junior Gold Report (JGR). No Guarantee as to Content: Although JGR attempts to research thoroughly and present information based on sources we believe to be reliable, there are no guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Any statements expressed are subject to change without notice. JGR, its associates, authors, and affiliates are not responsible for errors or omissions. Consideration for Services: JGR, it’s editor, affiliates, associates, partners, family members, or contractors may have an interest or position in featured, written-up companies, as well as sponsored companies which compensate JGR. JGR has been paid by the company written up. Thus, multiple conflicts of interests exist. Therefore, information provided herewithin should not be construed as a financial analysis but rather as an advertisement. The author’s views and opinions regarding the companies featured in reports are his own views and are based on information that he has researched independently and has received, which the author assumes to be reliable. No Offer to Sell Securities: JGR is not a registered investment advisor. JGR is intended for informational, educational and research purposes only. It is not to be considered as investment advice. Subscribers are encouraged to conduct their own research and due diligence, and consult with their own independent financial and tax advisors with respect to any investment opportunity. No statement or expression of any opinions contained in this report constitutes an offer to buy or sell the shares of the companies mentioned herein. Links: JGR may contain links to related websites for stock quotes, charts, etc. JGR is not responsible for the content of or the privacy practices of these sites. Release of Liability: By reading JGR, you agree to hold Junior Gold Report its associates, sponsors, affiliates, and partners harmless and to completely release them from any and all liabilities due to any and all losses, damages, or injuries (financial or otherwise) that may be incurred.

Forward Looking Statements
Except for statements of historical fact, certain information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are usually identified by our use of certain terminology, including “will”, “believes”, “may”, “expects”, “should”, “seeks”, “anticipates”, “has potential to”, or “intends’ or by discussions of strategy, forward looking numbers or intentions. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results or achievements to be materially different from any future results or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts, and include but are not limited to, estimates and their underlying assumptions; statements regarding plans, objectives and expectations with respect to the effectiveness of the Company’s business model; future operations, products and services; the impact of regulatory initiatives on the Company’s operations; the size of and opportunities related to the market for the Company’s products; general industry and macroeconomic growth rates; expectations related to possible joint and/or strategic ventures and statements regarding future performance. Junior Gold Report does not take responsibility for accuracy of forward looking statements and advises the reader to perform own due diligence on forward looking numbers or statements.