Home Blog Page 222

Don’t Bank On Rate Hikes!

0

This past Friday, June 3rd, 2016, The Bureau of Labor Statistics released their most recent report regarding new employment data and nonfarm payroll employment which indicates that during May of 2016, it was the smallest increase seen in 28 months.

During May of 2016, there were 144,592,000 payroll jobs within the US, which was up by 1.6 percent, or equivalent to 2.3 million jobs, from May of 2015 (These are all not-seasonally-adjusted numbers).

That represents the smallest year-over-year increase that has been reported since February of 2014, at which time payroll jobs increased by 1.57 percent. The largest year-over-year increase, in recent years, was reported during July of 2015, when it was up by 2.18 percent:

jobs1

Since July of 2015, the general trend in growth has been down. This 1.6 percent remains well below where growth was during most of the 1990’s.

I am not fond of using the seasonally adjusted numbers, since they add an additional layer of ‘needless manipulation’. I do prefer to compare job growth, from the same time of year, over several years.

When I do this, I find that the job growth from April to May of 2016, was the lowest April-May growth total since 2009:

jobs2

From April to May of 2016, there were 651,000 new jobs added, which is a significant drop from that same period of time, last year when 947,000 jobs had been added. Over the past decade, this current year of 2016, in this measure, beats out only 2008 and 2009, both of which were years of ‘economic decline’. Therefore, May of 2016 was the weakest May on record, for job growth, in eight years.

The Secretary of Labor, Tom Perez attempted to blame everything on the Verizon strike. That is a nice “spin”, however, the strike does not explain the obvious ‘decline’ in the year-over-year numbers! The strike might explain why the May numbers dropped off as much as they did, however, it cannot explain the ‘trend’. It is a bit of a stretch to blame this drop from April-May of 2015 to April-May of 2016 on the Verizon strike.

Mr. Perez, however, attempted some other, even less convincing, claims as well, stating that the U.S.’s insufficient mandates on paid family leave means that fewer women are entering the work force, and therefore pushing down the jobs totals. Is this IMPORTANT? The answer is NO! These bad numbers merely reflect our current poor economic situation, today!
In any case, the overall trend should not be a big surprise, as it has always has been weak. It has been dependent on the FED and their low interest rates. In recent quarters, the FED has finally been backed into a corner and has become hawkish. Realizing that more rate cuts are unlikely to occur any time soon, the economy is not receiving the usual FED-manufactured stimulus which investors and companies have both become accustomed to. With the FED talking about the need to raise ‘rates’, who can be surprised that the “recovery” is nonexistent?

The financial news, of the past few weeks, had its cadre of regional FED Presidents attempting to sway markets into believing that the Central Bank was sure to ‘hike’ interest rates during this current month of June 2016.

The jobs report sent ‘shock waves’ throughout the entire financial system. The report printed a jobs number of just 38,000 new employees, which is the lowest single month since the height of the “Great Recession”.

What is even more ludicrous than this, is the fact that the unemployment rate fell to 4.7 percent seeing as 664,000 workers are no longer being counted and included, by the government, within the labor force.

The FED relies heavily on these ‘manipulated’ government jobs numbers, the idea of “data dependency” being used to determine when to ‘hike’ or ‘drop’ interest rates shows the incompetency of a body that supposedly employs hundreds of economists who are dedicated to discover the true state of the economy and of its’ economic data. This in turn, should provide Americans with the reality that not only does the Central Bank have any idea what they are doing, but, more often than not their policy decisions are based on ‘incorrect’ and ‘outdated’ models which have only served to make matters worse, since the “Credit Crisis of 2008”.

The majority of jobs created were either part-time or low-wage service sector oriented. You can bank on the fact that the FED is now more likely to lower ‘rates’ than they are to raise them, going forward!

Today, it is both unlikely and irrational for the FED to raise interest rates either now or in the near future, despite the Central Banks’ recent “moral suasion” on mass media, of a potential rate ‘hike’ occurring as early as this month or possibly next month. The FED continues to create policies in an attempt to protect the economy and stock markets through November of 2016 so as to “spin” the election in favor of Hillary Clinton. This is due to the uncertainty from the presumptive Republican candidate, Donald Trump, who may force the Central Bank into ending its’ mission to fuel ‘stock and housing bubbles’. I, myself, as well as many economists, are seeing the ‘Summer of 2016’ as a dangerous period of time where and when a financial, economic, or monetary ‘collapse’ could take place from any number of ‘flashpoints’. The actions that are now taking place, in the equity markets, are an indication that these ‘fears’ may very well be arriving much sooner than most analysts expect.

The economy is still performing ‘significantly’ below its’ potential:

The problem is that the FED, including other Central Banks, have waited too long and gone too far in their ‘zero interest rate’ policies and ‘quantitative easing’ programs. With all of this nonsensical talk coming from the FED, the debt default levels, especially for credit default swaps on the 10-year Treasury are NOW at their highest level since the FED raised rates by a quarter of a point, back in December of 2015.

The probability of a U.S. default of its’ debt has hit its’ highest point since the FED has hiked rates in December of 2015. This is indicated by the recent dynamics in credit-default swap (CDS) agreements. The expectations that the Central Bank may raise borrowing costs still further, in the coming months, will set off this ‘time bomb’. Since the FED has turned increasingly hawkish of their policy outlook since late April 2016, market volatility has increased, with stocks swinging between gains and losses and U.S. Treasuries sliding along slide with the dollar. “Systemic risks” stemming from the CDS transactions are rising amidst the unfavorable global financial environment. This is not only true in the U.S., but its’ counterparts are also subject to greater turmoil in the coming months, as possible FED hikes, “Brexit” concerns, U.S. elections and faltering global growth are all interconnected factors thereby contributing to the recent spikes in U.S. CDS spreads.

If things follow the FED script, I imagine that next months’ payrolls will exceed ‘tapered down’ expectations and consequently, there will be an upward revision of Mays’ numbers. Will this continue sending the market into exuberance? NO! However, the FED officials will then restart the rate ‘hike’ talks with just enough offsetting uncertainties to mislead everyone while trying to keep the market ‘bubble’ from ‘bursting’.

The financial system is like a giant game of poker with all the major player holding a seven and two off suite (worst hand you can have), yet they are all-in with their chips (money & policies) trying to bluff their way out of this mess.
Things are going to be very crazy over the next 6-12 months and beyond, but until the US large cap stocks breakdown and start a bear market expect tough trading and investing.

Find out what I think the market is doing and where its headed with my ETF Trade Alerts: www.TheGoldAndOilGuy.com
Chris Vermeulen

MGX Minerals Acquires Rights to Rapid Lithium Brine Production Process

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA – June 6, 2016 – MGX Minerals Inc. (“MGX” or the “Company”) (CSE: XMG / FKT:1MG) is pleased to report the Company has acquired intellectual property and design rights (the “Rights”) to a proprietary processing design that proposes to reduce lithium brine evaporation times by >99% over standard solar evaporation pond processes, from approximately 18 months to 1 day.
The design was developed as part of the previously announced Design and Scoping Study. All intellectual property rights have now been acquired from the inventor. The Company has retained Fasken Martineau, an international business law firm, to conduct an intellectual property assessment and prepare documentation for the filing of a patent.

MGX currently controls a land package of approximately 300,000 hectares (1,150 square miles) of lithium brine bearing properties in Alberta. This includes 14 of the 24 highest grade (>=90mg/L) lithium assays throughout the Province as reported by the Alberta Geological Service. The production process was designed specifically for the highly mineralized brine associated with MGX’S lithium properties.

“This proprietary design process, combined with vast existing infrastructure in Alberta, positons MGX at the forefront of the rapidly developing lithium brine industry,” stated MGX President and CEO Jared Lazerson. “The potential advantage of using a new design to reduce lithium brine processing time is significant. Solar evaporation is necessary due to a deficiency of infrastructure that existing lithium brine producers face, particularly in the remote high altitude deserts of South America where options are extremely limited. As well, the cost/revenue model has shifted dramatically due to surging demand for lithium compounds, creating an opportunity to change how lithium is produced moving forward. There are a number of areas for improvement including the elimination of solar evaporation. We believe the Company has solved the issue of very long production times, relatively low recoveries (40-50%) currently associated with lithium brine processing, and real estate requirement of lake size solar evaporation ponds. We are now moving to protect this intellectual property as it may have great value to MGX and the lithium industry moving forward.”

About MGX Minerals
MGX Minerals (CSE: XMG) is a diversified Canadian mining company engaged in the acquisition and development of industrial mineral deposits in western Canada that offer near-term production potential, minimal barriers to entry and low initial capital expenditures. The Company operates lithium, magnesium and silicon projects throughout British Columbia and Alberta, including the Driftwood magnesium project. MGX has recently received approval of a 20 year mining lease for Driftwood and bulk sampling is currently underway.

For more information please visit the Company’s website at www.mgxminerals.com.

Contact Information
Jared Lazerson
Chief Executive Officer
Telephone: 604.681.7735
Email: jared@mgxminerals.com

Neither the Canadian Securities Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the Canadian Securities Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking information or forward-looking statements (collectively “forward-looking information”) within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information is typically identified by words such as: “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “estimate”, “postulate” and similar expressions, or are those, which, by their nature, refer to future events. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking information provided by the Company is not a guarantee of future results or performance, and that actual results may differ materially from those in forward-looking information as a result of various factors. The reader is referred to the Company’s public filings for a more complete discussion of such risk factors and their potential effects which may be accessed through the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Stock Market Elliott Wave Count, Economic Cycle and Equities Cycle

0

Stock Market Elliott Wave Count, Economic Cycle and Equities Cycle

As you know a picture is worth 1000 words so consider this short yet detailed post a juicy 2000+ word report on the current state of the stock market and economic cycle.

The charts below I think will help you see where the US stock market and economic cycles appear to be.

The first image shows two cycles, the blue one is the stock market cycle and which sectors typically outperform during specific times within the cycle. Here you will see that during the late stages of a bull market the safe haven plays become the preferred choice for investors – Energy and Precious Metals.

Typically, the stock market tops before the economic (business) cycle does. Why? Because investors can see sales starting to slow and that earnings will start to weaken and share prices will fall, so the market participants start selling shares before the masses see and hear about a weakening economy. The stock market usually moves 3-9 months before the economic cycle change I known by the masses.

oilandgold

Stock Market Topping According to Sector Analysis

elliet wave]

Elliott Wave Count – My Educated Guess

Elliott wave theory is a tough strategy to follow. Meaning, if you gave the same chart to 5 different people you would likely have 3 or 5 very different wave counts.

Recently I have seen a flurry of EW charts on the SP500 wave count which I do not think are correct. When I do Elliott Wave counts I like to use more than just price. I look into things deeper and use the market internals, volume flows, and overall market sentiment during those times. They must all be screaming extreme FEAR in the market in order for me to count it as a wave low.

Fear is much easier to read and time than greed. So based on waves of fear and I can plot the rest of the waves. By doing this, I feel it gives a truer reading of significant highs and lows we should use in our analysis.

See my analysis below for a visual…

ellietwavecount

Stock Market & Economic Cycle Conclusion:

In short, the current market analysis, in my opinion, is still very bearish and this could actually be the ultimate last opportunity to get short the market near the highs before we dive into a full blown bear market in the next 3-5 months.

I will admit, the market is trying VERY hard to convince us it wants to go higher as it flirts with the recent highs for its second time in the past 8 months. I know it is doing its job because so many traders and investors are changing their tune from bearish to SUPER BULLISH.

I don’t see it that way JUST yet, but it could happen as the market can do and will do whatever it wants. But all my analysis (much more than what you see here) points to substantially lower prices over the next year.

To learn more and get my ETF swing trades and long term investing signals join me at www.TheGoldAndOilGuy.com

Chris Vermeulen

American Lithium Announces Exploration Permits

American Lithium Announces Exploration Permits to Commence Phase 2 Drill Program in Northern Fish Lake Valley
Lithium Brine Project

On track to commence Phase 2 Exploration Drill Program in 2H 2016, with permits for 13 drill holes

• Follow-up to NI 43-101 Technical Report, Fish Lake Valley Lithium-Brine Property, November 30, 2015

June 1, 2016 – Vancouver, British Columbia – American Lithium Corp. (TSXV: Li) (“American Lithium” or the “Company”), is pleased to announce that its wholly owned subsidiary 1032701 B.C. (“1032701”), has received a notice-of-intent exploration work permit from the Bureau of Land Management to conduct a Phase 2 exploratory drilling program at its 7,840 acre (3,172.7 hectare) North Bowl Playa lithium brine project in Fish Lake Valley, Esmeralda County, Nevada (see Company’s news release dated April 7, 2016).

“The geological setting at Fish Lake Valley is highly analogous to the salars of Clayton Valley, where Albemarle has its Silver Peak lithium-brine operation,” commented Michael Kobler, CEO of American Lithium. “Over the past 6 years, previous operators have been investigating the Company’s North Bowl Playa, Fish Lake Valley lithium brine property. A National Instrument 43-101 report titled Technical Report, Fish Lake Valley Lithium-Brine Property, Esmeralda County, Nevada, was completed on the property in November 2015. The purpose of our Phase 2 exploration drill program is to test several potential brine lithium targets identified in the Phase 1 Exploration Program which included surface brine sampling, gravity geophysics and 3,545 feet (1080 meters) of shallow auger and direct push drilling within 41 holes at 25 sites ranging from 42 feet to 150 feet in depth. We also plan to do more high density gravity surveys to better define the subsurface structure and shallow auger brine test holes across the entire holding.”

The Company intends to contract an exploration drilling company to complete up to 13 drill holes to approximately 500ft in depth to firm up its North Bowl Playa shallow prospect as part of its Phase 2 exploratory drill program.
Phase 1 Exploration Program Results
A number of geochemical and geophysical studies were completed on the property, along with a short drill program conducted on the periphery of the playa in the fall of 2010. Near-surface brine sampling during the spring of 2011 outlined a boron/lithium/potassium anomaly on the northern portions of the northern playa, roughly 1.3 x 2 miles long, which has a smaller higher grade core where lithium mineralization ranges from 100 to 150 mg/L (average 122.5 mg/L), with boron ranging from 1,500 to 2,670 mg/L (average 2,219 mg/L), and potassium from 5,400 to 8,400 mg/L (average 7,030 mg/L). Wet conditions on the playa precluded drilling in 2011, and for a good portion of 2012, however a window of opportunity opened in late fall 2012. In November/December 2012, a short direct push drill program was conducted on the northern end of the playa, wherein a total of 1,240.58 feet (378.09 meters) was drilled in 20 holes at 17 discrete sites, and an area of 3,356 feet (1,023 meters) by 2,776 feet (846 meters) was systematically explored by grid probing. The deepest hole was 81 feet (24.69 meters), and the shallowest hole that produced brine was 34 feet (10.36 meters). The average depth of the holes drilled during the program was 62 feet (18.90 meters). The program successfully demonstrated that lithium-boron-potassium-enriched brines exist to at least 62 feet (18.9 meters) depth in sandy or silty aquifers that vary from approximately three to ten feet (one to three meters) in thickness. Average lithium, boron and potassium contents of all samples are 47.05 mg/L, 992.7 mg/L, and 0.535% respectively, with lithium values ranging from 7.6 mg/L to 151.3 mg/L, boron ranging from 146 to 2,160.7 mg/L, and potassium ranging from 0.1 to 1.3%. The anomaly outlined by the program is 1,476 by 2,461 feet (450 meters by 750 meters), and is not fully delimited, as the area available for probing was restricted due to soft ground
conditions to the east and to the south. A 50 mg/L lithium cutoff is used to define this anomaly and within this zone average lithium, boron and potassium contents are 90.97 mg/L, 1,532.92 mg/L, and 0.88% respectively.

Michael Collins, P.Geo. is the Company’s designated Qualified Person within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101, and has reviewed and approved the technical information contained in this news release.

For further information, contact Michael Kobler at info@americanlithiumcorp.com

ABOUT American Lithium Corp.
American Lithium Corp. is actively engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of lithium deposits within mining-friendly jurisdictions throughout the Americas. American Lithium holds options to acquire Nevada lithium brine claims totaling 20,790 acres (8,413 hectares), including 18,552 acres (7,508 hectares) in Fish Lake Valley, Esmeralda County, and the 2,240 acre (907 hectare) San Emidio Project in Washoe County. The Company’s Fish Lake Valley lithium brine properties are located approximately 38 kilometers from Albemarle’s Silver Peak, the largest lithium operation in the U.S., approximately 3.5 hours from the Tesla Gigafactory. American Lithium is listed on the TSXV under the trading symbol “Li”. For further information, please visit the Company’s website at www.americanlithiumcorp.com.

On behalf of the Board,

American Lithium Corp.

Michael Kobler, Chief Executive Officer

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

There’s No Fever Like Gold Fever

0

Michael Ballanger |

Precious metals expert Michael Ballanger discusses how investors should interpret the recent shifts in gold and silver “market techtonics.”

As we move rapidly through the spring of 2016 and with summer less than a month away, I thought it would be a good time to revisit the main markets that dwell on my financial radar screen (gold, silver, gold and silver equities, and the S&P 500) because there has been a fairly sizable shift in market tectonics, particularly in gold and perhaps more ominously in silver over the past month.

Call it deterioration in momentum or correction; the NYSE.Arca Gold BUGS Index (HUI) is off 10% from its top at 236.23. I am almost afraid to mention the term Commitment of Traders or the word Commercials because everyone from Dennis Gartman to “kitchen chair financial planners” have now become “COT experts,” pointing fingers and resurrecting archived blog posts from the last 10 years to prove their exclusive ownership of “COT analysis.”

This humble scribe only learned about the COT some 10 years ago but cast it aside as a play toy for “eccentric gold traders” until 2015 when, thanks to my good friends at Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee (GATA), I started reading interpretations by the likes of Bill Murphy. Taking his lead, I delved deeper into the role of the bullion banks and why it was that, unlike every other market in the world, technical support and resistance levels were meaningless. I discovered that the only way one could monitor the activities of those banks that act and execute for the Exchange Stabilization Fund (another topic for another day) was to monitor the very banks that show up in the Participation Rate survey and which are represented as “Commercial Traders” in the COT.

So, if the guys painting the tape to create false breakouts and false breakdowns RELIGIOUSLY, time after time, are the same guys that can sell infinite amounts of synthetic “metal” represented as a keystroke entry on a inventory spreadsheet with ZERO correlation to actual vault inventories, then I better damn well USE that data as a rudimentary “tracking bracelet” of the Crimex criminals. Could the data be cooked? Of course, but I take the attitude that this is a data set designed not for the public but for the other bullion banks to check up on one another to see who is cheating and who is singing the proper words from the “hymn sheet.”

Needless to say, the last four months of action in the metals has been bizarre. While there is “no fever like gold fever,” that the gold market traded up $250 in the first quarter with the Relative Strength Index (RSI) peaking on Feb. 7 at 86.75 (above 70 is a “sell”) at $1,263 was certainly enough to give us a short, sharp correction to $1,190 (for about a half a minute) and then despite waning RSI, waning Moving Average Convergence/Divergence (MACD), gold actually powered higher to an intraday level of $1,306 before succumbing to profit taking. Silver made its run to $18 as gold was dancing, but as I ponder the charts and breathe in the air of sentiment from the caverns of Bay Street, I get the sense that bullish sentiment has resumed as if 2011–2015 never occurred.

It took almost a decade for the Commercial Traders to amass a net short position of nearly 300,000 contracts, culminating in the 2011 top after a 766% advance in gold prices. It has taken a mere four months to repeat the drill. FOUR MONTHS! Friday’s COT showing a 290,243-contract short position against total open interest at nearly 600,000 means that gold has gone from the dark depths of bear market misery with Commercials short a paltry 2,911 contracts back in early December to the exalted peak of bull market euphoria not seen since 2011 at 290,243, while the cycle of extremes took 1/33 of the time. That, my friends, is either a testimonial to the raw power of this new Golden Bull or it’s a classic case of “Too far, too fast” and we are headed lower.

Which camp should we be in? Better still, how do we play it out? Now, coming from the “analyst” that called the bottom in early December, be it known for the record that I exited the leveraged ETFs (Direxion Daily Gold Gold Miners Index [NUGT] and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 3X [JNUG]) and then a bit later the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX)—at huge profits—way too early when the COT report showed Commercial shorts at a 12-month high north of 166,000. My thinking was that there would be an initial pullback after the mindboggling rally that saw RSI for the HUI hit 86.75, and MACD and the Histograms all confirming wildly overbought conditions in both the metals and in the shares.

Furthermore, last Friday, I had the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners (GDXJ) May $35 puts I owned expire, so I replaced the May hedge with the GDXJ June $37 puts for $2.30. Mind you, I did not touch my massive aggregation of junior explorer/developers all of which have done exceedingly well. However, what to do now is difficult because while I have been forecasting a “correction that will rip your face off,” it was the action in the gold-to-silver ratio that gave me encouragement that perhaps the Commercials would indeed get “theirs.” Having shorted the gold-to-silver ratio above 80, it traded down to 72.95 recently, but in the past few weeks has reversed back up ward (75.96) and as I have babbled on about ad nauseum for years, you aren’t going to sustain a gold rally with silver underperforming. Lately, silver has been doing just that and that ain’t good.

All of this cyber-jabbing that I read, as bloggers and newsletter writers engage in gold authority one-upmanship be it through podcasts or YouTube or FaceBook, is really akin to having a cocktail party debate amongst home security experts about which system one should install as a thief sneaks into your upstairs bedroom and removes all the valuables from the safe. Suddenly the party is over and you won the debate but all your valuables are gone. As we all talk up our books and go back out on speaking tours (now that someone actually cares), the bullion bank behemoths have actually entered your upstairs bedroom AND your office and taken your goodies AND installed listening devices. These cretins are now short as much synthetic gold as at any point since Gordon Brown dumped the U.K.’s gold holdings at the exact bottom in 1999. How on earth can one carry a gold or silver or GDX/GDXJ position without being hedged?

Calling for a correction since March-April has allowed me to seesaw back and forth but as we have all been arguing and sniping and chirping over the next $100 move, the gold price has moved sideways in perhaps a $50 band while the bankster banditos have raided the vault. With gold printing $1,235 this morning and the Commercials short roughly 300,000 contracts, on a notional basis, every $10 down move is a $300 million improvement on a marked-to-market basis. More importantly, support lines on everybody’s charts are breaking like wind at a bean-eating contest, so this week could easily be a nasty one.

The “Fido Indicator” worked like a charm; two weeks ago with gold at nearly $1,300, he was a goofy, tongue-hanging-out, tail-wagging fool of a dog all happied up and snoozing on my feet under the desk; today with gold at $1,235, he is nowhere to be found. along with the other inhabitant of this house, which means the dog will be eating steak somewhere tonight while I am dining on Alpo Fettucine with a fine Chianti and some fava beans. . .

Originally trained during the inflationary 1970s, Michael Ballanger is a graduate of Saint Louis University where he earned a Bachelor of Science in finance and a Bachelor of Art in marketing before completing post-graduate work at the Wharton School of Finance. With more than 30 years of experience as a junior mining and exploration specialist, as well as a solid background in corporate finance, Ballanger’s adherence to the concept of “Hard Assets” allows him to focus the practice on selecting opportunities in the global resource sector with emphasis on the precious metals exploration and development sector. Ballanger takes great pleasure in visiting mineral properties around the globe in the never-ending hunt for early-stage opportunities.

Source: Michael Ballanger

Want to read more Gold Report articles like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.

Disclosure:
1) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of Michael Ballanger and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. Michael Ballanger is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. Streetwise Reports was not involved in any aspect of the article preparation or editing so the author could speak independently about the sector. Michael Ballanger was not paid by Streetwise Reports LLC for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article.
2) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
3) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview until after it publishes.

All charts courtesy of Michael Ballanger

Streetwise – The Gold Report is Copyright © 2016 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.

Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.

Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.

Participating companies provide the logos used in The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.

DISCLOSURE: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not represent the views of equities.com. Readers should not consider statements made by the author as formal recommendations and should consult their financial advisor before making any investment decisions. To read our full disclosure, please go to: http://www.equities.com/disclaimer

The SILVER Bullet

0

Dr. Kal Kotecha PhD

In folklore, a bullet cast from silver was the only weapon that was effective against werewolves, witches, and other monsters. But is silver a great way to currently slay the markets?

The amazing thing about silver is that it has a remarkable dual quality. Like many resources and consumer goods, silver has many practical purposes including its unsurpassed thermal and electrical conductivity for use in electronics, reflectivity solar energy collection, and as a catalyst in chemical production. But silver is also a form of money and like fiat money such as the U.S. currency, it is a store of value and is used as a medium of exchange. Therefore, it is not just the intrinsic value of silver that determines its price but also the state of significant global currencies and economies.

To clarify, if you are an investor (and not a trader) in silver then look at silver from a long-term perspective. Silver has been and continues to be an invaluable resource for the reasons I have outlined. Having the conviction to believe that the fundamentals are on your side while being unleveraged and holding a balanced portfolio should mean you can sleep at night knowing you can sit and wait on your golden (or silver) egg to hatch.

So let’s talk economics. In the market equilibrium model of supply and demand, two things can happen that will cause an increase in the price of a good or service; either an increase in demand or a decrease in supply. In the market for silver, there are both. Focusing on the demand side, individual investors and governments are buying record amounts of silver. According to CNBC.com  http://www.cnbc.com/2015/12/01/us-mint-american-eagle-gold-coin-sales-surge-silver-at-record.html: The U.S. Mint’s sales of American Eagle coins surged in November 2015, with gold nearly tripling month-over-month and silver already reaching a new annual record as bullion prices fell to multi-year lows,. The mint sold 97,000 ounces of American Eagle gold coins in November, up 185 percent from October and 62 percent higher from a year ago, after selling out of most of the 2015-dated coins as falling bullion prices attracted buyers.

Strong demand came as spot gold prices fell around 7 percent to the lowest in nearly six years. This was the gold market’s biggest monthly drop in 2-1/2 years. Demand for American Eagle silver coins has also been strong, with year-to-date sales already reaching an annual record at 44.67 million ounces, breaking the full-year record of 44 million ounces in 2014.

Even more interesting is the demand for silver bars by India and China. According to goldcore.com,  http://www.goldcore.com/us/gold-blog/indian-silver-demand-explodes-to-us-silver-owners-delight: The first four months of 2015 saw India import possibly as much as 3,000 tonnes of silver bullion. If the momentum is maintained India is on track to import a staggering 9,000 tonnes over the course of 2015. This would represent almost one third of total annual mine supply globally. Worldwide mine supply was 877 million troy ounces (27,277 metric tonnes). It would represent a 27% increase in India’s 2014 silver imports of 7063 tonnes which itself was a 13%  increase on the 2013 figure showing a steadily growing demand for physical silver in India with each passing year.

As earlier outlined, I claimed that one of the amazing qualities of silver is that it is a store of value. People have historically trusted it to be a stable form of commodity money. With the aggressive printing of money by the U.S. and the rest of the world to precipitate their economy, a store of wealth in both gold and silver is used as a hedge of protection against a falling economy.

China has trillions of U.S. dollars that it has been converting into hard assets (a.k.a. gold). Considering many countries had silver reserves backing their currencies only 150 years ago, if China ever decided to be a large silver buyer there would be a huge shift in the price of silver, which may come sooner than later as their economy continues to falter. I believe both gold/silver imports will increase.

Above all else, gold is silver’s primary driver, dominating sentiment in the market for precious metals. The ratio of gold to silver is the highest it’s ever been at around 75:1. I believe could see that drop to 40: 1 or less meaning the price of silver should rise 2:1 on a proportion basis to gold.

Charles Oliver, former lead portfolio manager with the Sprott Gold and Precious Minerals Fund, made an interesting note about the relationship between silver and gold in a Q&A session. He pointed out that, “for over 1,000 years, the silver-gold price relationship was close to 16:1, so that implies that if gold is $1,600/oz, the silver price would be $100/oz. The last time that happened was 1980 when the gold price was roughly $800/oz and the silver price was around $50/oz. I expect to see the ratio migrate toward 16:1.”

So what are you packing your pistol with? The market can seem as scary as werewolves, witches, and other monsters. So don’t forget to do your homework and be confident enough to ride out the bumps with undervalued silver bullion and stock holdings. Feel free to join our free newsletter.

Happy Investing!

Kal Kotecha PhD
References

“A Few Reasons to Consider Buying Silver | SilverSeek.com.”SilverSeek.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 May 2014. <http://www.silverseek.com/article/few-reasons-consider-buying-silver-13208>.

Hamilton, Adam. “Professional Silver Stealth Buying Underway In Futures And ETFs.” Seeking Alpha. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 May 2014. <http://seekingalpha.com/article/2223163-professional-silver-stealth-buying-underway-in-futures-and-etfs?ifp=0>.

Kranzler, Dave. “Is Something Big Brewing In Silver?.” Seeking Alpha. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 May 2014. <http://seekingalpha.com/article/2207703-is-something-big-brewing-in-silver?ifp=0>.

“Sell In May And Go Away Definition | Investopedia.” Investopedia. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 May 2014. <http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sell-in-may-and-go-away.asp>.

The Gold Report. “Time Is The Trigger For Equities And Bullion: Charles Oliver.”Seeking Alpha. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 May 2014. <http://seekingalpha.com/article/2227523-time-is-the-trigger-for-equities-and-bullion-charles-oliver?ifp=0>.

“The Many Uses of Silver.” Uses of Silver in Electronics, Coins, Jewelry, Medicine. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2014. <http://geology.com/articles/uses-of-silver/>.

Y., Ivan. “Can Silver Drop To Single Digits?.” Seeking Alpha. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 May 2014. <http://seekingalpha.com/article/2199373-can-silver-drop-to-single-digits?ifp=0>.